Acid Attack On Woman!

Found this article by The Mail Foreign Service

This was the blazing newspaper headline. "Woman severely burned after acid-like liquid thrown into her face tells of horror attack by total stranger!"

By Mail Foreign Service
Eyesight saved by sunglasses she bought hours earlier, claims mother
Police hunting African-American woman in her late twenties or early thirties

A 28-year-old woman severely burned when a stranger threw an acid-like liquid in her face has vowed that the attack will not ruin her life.

Bethany Storro was about to walk into a Starbucks cafe when a female approached her out of the blue and asked, 'Hey pretty girl, do you want to drink this?'.
The total stranger then threw a cup of liquid in Miss Storro's face - and doctors believe it was a kind of acid.
She is now recovering in the burns unit at a hospital in Portland, Oregon, having undergone surgery - and she held a press conference today recounting her ordeal.
Severely burned: Bethany Storro is flanked by her parents Nancy and Joe Neuwelt during a news conference today at Legacy Emanuel Hospital in Portland, Oregon. She is recovering after a stranger threw an acid-like substance in her face

Before surgery: Bethany suffered second-degree burns to her face, but doctors say the operation went well
Heavily bandaged after her operation, and flanked by her mother and father, Nancy and Joe Neuwelt, she said: 'It was the most painful thing ever. My heart stopped. It ripped through my clothing the instant it touched my shirt; I could feel it burning through my second layer of skin.'
Her mother said she believed that her daughter's eyesight could have been lost had she not been wearing a pair of sunglasses she had only bought hours earlier. She referred to it as 'the hand of God protecting her eyes - she would have been blind'.

Miss Storro insisted that she would not let the attack wreck her life, and even joked about the possibility of losing her sight.
She revealed that she had spinal meningitis twice as a child, which robbed her of most of her hearing, and said, 'Oh my gosh, to be hard of hearing and blind? That would drive them nuts', referring to her parents.
'Hey pretty girl': The chilling words the stranger spoke to Bethany before throwing an acid-like liquid in her face

Starbucks: The scene of the attack in Vancouver, Washington. Police are hunting for an African-American female suspect
She added: 'They have to be in the same room for me to hear them. I'm just so glad it's a miracle.'
About her attacker, who struck in Vancouver, Washington, she said: 'I have never, ever seen this girl in my entire life. When I first saw her, she had this weirdness about her - like jealousy, rage.
'Was it a dare, or did the woman wake up Monday morning and tell herself that today, she was going to "carry some acid in a cup and throw it on the first person I see?".'

Vancouver police spokeswoman Kim Kapp said that doctors and authorities are trying to determine what kind of substance caused Miss Storro's facial burns.
Police have described the suspect as an African-American female between 25 and 35 years old. Eyewitnesses say she was wearing a green shirt and khaki pants at the time of attack. Her hair is described as either in a ponytail or slicked back.
Dr Nick Eshraghi said Miss Storro suffered second-degree burns and perhaps deeper burns. He added that his goal during the surgery was to remove as much damaged skin as possible.
Mrs Neuwelt called the attack 'an act of evil', while Mr Neuwelt said the family hoped the attacker was quickly found.
'You can imagine how I feel,' he said. 'This is my little girl. We're going to get through this we're not going to allow this to stop our lives. We're going to get through it.

And Then......

The truth comes out. It was a HOAX!!!

These were the shocking newspaper headlines. "Acid attack 'victim' who gained world's sympathy after horrific attack admits her injuries were self-inflicted!".

The woman who gained sympathy around the world after a stranger threw acid in her face has made a shocking confession: she made the whole thing up.

Yet Another Scapegoater!

Well, that Mysterious Unidentified Black Man (MUBM), who commits all the crimes white people don't want to admit to, has struck again in Philly.

According to the Philadelphia Inquirer:

A Philadelphia police sergeant who said he was shot last month by an unidentified black man in the city's Overbrook section actually fabricated the entire story and shot himself, Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey said this morning. Sgt. Robert Ralston, a 21-year veteran of the department, admitted to homicide detectives early this morning that his previously reported story was false.

Ramsey called the incident "a terrible and embarrassing chapter in our history." Asked why Ralston concocted the tale and injured himself, Ramsey said he didn't know.

Allison Steele, a writer for the Inquirer, reported on Tuesday:

Ralston will be suspended for 30 days with the intent to dismiss, Ramsey said. Ralston, married with five children, will face no criminal charges in the case, because he was offered immunity in exchange for his confession.
Ralston will also have to pay the cost of the massive manhunt that was sparked by his tale on April 5, Ramsey said.

In a frantic search for the MUBM, police spent hours combing a West Philadelphia neighborhood for possible suspects, although no one was formally questioned or arrested. The Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5, had even posted a $10,000 reward for information leading to the suspect.

Ralston's original story was that he was on patrol in the early hours of April 5, when he stopped two men for questioning. One of the men ran; the other man, drew a gun and put it to Ralston's head, he told police. Ralston said he knocked the gun out of the way and it went off, grazing him in the shoulder. He told police he shot at the man as he ran off and possibly struck him.

Steele reports that Ralston's story was suspect from the beginning. She states, "Police said the facts of the case just didn't add up. There was powder residue on his shirt that matched his own service weapon, indicating he was shot at close range. His reaction to the shooting also drew suspicion, and police said he seemed eager to cast himself in the role of a hero."

Ralston apparently described his assailant as black, because the area where the shooting took place is predominantly African American, the commissioner said.

Ramsey said Ralston's badge number would be retired, and that no other officer would ever wear the same number.
"It's troubling in a lot of ways," Ramsey said. "It inflames racial tensions in our community, and that's certainly something we don't need."

Ramsey stated that it was fortunate that officers never stopped or arrested anyone matching Ralston's description of the gunman.

Most recently, we had the white guy who dressed up as a MUBM to rob a bank; we remember Susan Smith, who drowned her two kids and blamed the MUBM; and let's not forget the Boston murderer Charles Stuart who killed his pregnant wife and blamed it on the MUBM.

Look, white people, it's 2010. We are all on to the MUBM by now.

Haven't you heard about the boy who cried wolf? Will you please blame your foolishness on someone else? How about the person who is actually guilty - you? I just hope the citizens of Philadelphia make certain that Ralston's suspension "with intent to dismiss" ends in a true dismissal.

Shame on you, officer Ralston.

Boston Scapegoater Killed Pregnant Wife Then Blamed Imaginary Black Man

On Oct. 23, 1989, Charles Stuart shot and killed his pregnant wife, Carol Stuart. His accusation that a black man was responsible inflamed racial tensions in Boston.Charles Stuart Murders Wife


ShareCharles Stuart and his pregnant wife Carol left a maternity class at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston on Oct. 23, 1989. As they drove home, Charles drove to Mission Hills, a predominantly African-American neighborhood, and shot Carol in the head.

Charles then shot himself in the abdomen and called 911, saying that he and his wife had been shot. A film crew for CBS’ “Rescue 911,” which had been shooting at the Boston Emergency Medical Services, captured the entire event on camera.

As Charles was strapped onto a gurney and taken inside an ambulance, he gave police details of the alleged crime. A policeman asks him, “Who did it? Was he a white guy?” Charles responds, “He was a black man.”

Carol Stuart died the following night. Her son, Christopher, was delivered via caesarean section, eight weeks before the due date. After suffering a series of seizures, he died two and a half weeks later. Charles Stuart authorized the discontinuation of life support.

Unable to attend his wife’s funeral due to his injuries, Stuart wrote a message to be read aloud. Of the murderer, he said, “In our souls we must forgive this sinner, because he would too.”
Later Developments: Investigation sparks racial tension; Stuart commits suicide
Sources in this Story
Time: Presumed Innocent
YouTube: Rescue 911—Episode 120—“Boston” (Part 2 of 3)
Harvard University (Was it Worth It?): The Forgotten Victim: The Collision of Race, Gender, and Murder
The New York Times: Racial Manipulation in Boston
The New York Times: Boston Police Partly Cleared Over Racial Tension
The New York Times: Charles Stuart’s Brother Indicted In Murder Case
The New York Times: Illusion and Tragedy Coexist After a Couple Dies
Stuart gained widespread sympathy for his tragic story, and few questioned his account of the events, even though there were numerous inconsistencies and suspicious details. Police began a citywide search for the culprit, described by Stuart as a black man with a raspy voice who wore a tracksuit.

Officers used “the ‘stop-and-search’ method: the idea being that if you stop every black man within a ten-mile radius, you are going to find your killer much more quickly,” wrote Jeanne Theoharis and Lisa Woznica in Was it Worth It? “Civil liberties thus suspended, a number of black jogging-suit-clad men soon turned up.”

The investigation was responsible for “instantly igniting the racial tension and suspicion that are never far from the surface of daily life in Boston and most of America,” wrote The New York Times.

In December, police fingered 39-year-old Willie Bennett, a black man who had been arrested on unrelated charges, as the prime suspect. Examining his mug shot, Stuart confirmed that Bennett was the man who killed his wife.

Stuart’s elaborate deception collapsed in early January 1990, when his brother Matthew told his family that Charles had killed Carol. Matthew had participated in the cover-up of the crime, taking a bag of valuables and the murder weapon from the crime scene and disposing of them in a nearby creek.

On Jan. 3, before his brother went to the police, Charles Stuart confessed him crime to his lawyer. That night, he checked into a hotel, woke up at 4:30 a.m., and went down to the Tobin Bridge to jump into the Mystic River, killing himself.
Key Players: Charles and Carol Stuart
Both born and raised in the Boston suburbs, Charles and Carol Stuart had met in 1980 at the restaurant where they both worked, and married five years later. They had supportive families, were liked by their neighbors and had well-paying jobs: Carol was a tax lawyer and Charles the general manager at a fur store.

The media originally portrayed the couple as having the perfect marriage. After Charles’ suicide, the media searched for a reason for the murder. There were rumors, later shown to be incorrect that Charles had a relationship with a 23-year-old co-worker. There were also reports that “Charles considered Carol's pregnancy a hindrance to his plans to open a restaurant and wanted her to have an abortion,” wrote Time.

For The Scapegoaters In The UK Only!

If you are NOT a scapegoater and take responsibility for any wrong you do or think in your mind, congratulations! But this blog is not addressed to you. If you are a scapegoater in the UK, you know who you are. It's time to take responsiblity for your own sexual perversion. Stop judging black women for the secret sin you are committing.

SCAPEGOATING DEFINED

By definition a 'scapegoat' is an innocent accused, blamed, and punished for someone else's sins, faults, mistakes, and problems. Other words used are a whipping boy or of a whip-boy. We all use a whipping boy each time we blame some one else for something we don't want to face in ourselves. In most cases scapegoating is an unconscious process. We are blaming the scapegoat without being aware that we are to blame, not the innocent scapegoat. In ancient times and in some cultures, the nobility could not be touched, thus they kept a whipping boy for this purpose. When a crime was committed that warranted physical punishment, a whipping-boy was used. Usually the whipping-boy was educated with, for instance, a prince and whipped whenever the prince deserved chastisement. DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS: Scapegoat, n. (O.T.) goat allowed to escape when Jewish chief priest had laid sins of people upon it.; person bearing blame due to others. - The Concise Oxford Dictionary Scapegoat n. one who is given all the blame or punishment for faults of which he is innocent..... - The Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English In Biblical times, one of the two goats upon which the sins of the entire Jewish people during the year just ended were loaded by the high priest in a symbolic ceremony on the Day of Atonement; the two goats were led forth or sent out into the wilderness to die and thus bring expiation for those sins. - Dictionary of Mysticism, ed. by Frank Gaynor, 1953 scapegoat - Scape is an archaic form of escape, the goat the animal upon whom, in the ancient Hebraic practice, the accumulated sins of the people were placed on Atonement Day. The goat thus symbolically burdened was then driven into the wild. Hence, scapegoating is the act of blaming a convenient (but innocent, as was the goat) person or group for one's own frustrations, grievances, guilts, etc. this phenomenon is found as a defense mechanism in individuals as well as a deliberate form of propaganda in governments. - The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology

Scapegoating is a hostile social - psychological discrediting routine by which people move blame and responsibility away from themselves and towards a target person or group. It is also a practice by which angry feelings and feelings of hostility may be projected, via inappropriate accusation, towards others. The target feels wrongly persecuted and receives misplaced vilification, blame and criticism; he is likely to suffer rejection from those who the perpetrator seeks to influence. Scapegoating has a wide range of focus: from "approved" enemies of very large groups of people down to the scapegoating of individuals by other individuals. Distortion is always a feature.

DEFINITION OF A SCAPEGOATER

"We still attribute to the other fellow all the evil and inferior qualities that we do not like to recognize in ourselves, and therefore have to criticize and attack him, when all that has happened is that an inferior soul has emigrated from one person to another" CG Jung.

"A scapegoater is anyone who blames others for something that he or she doesn't want to - or can't - face. The scapegoater transfers the responsibility of her or his own feelings and problems onto the scapegoat, often without any awareness of how seriously scapegoating may harm the scapegoat. And in a deeper sense even the scapegoater herself or himself. Because the scapegoater is quite unconscious of what he or she is doing, there may be almost no guilt feelings, sometimes the scapegoater actively denies her or his own actions and feelings. On the other hand there may be guilt feelings in some scapegoaters because they know only too well that the thing they are accusing the scapegoat of doing, is the very same thing they are guilty of doing themselves, probably secretly, and often carrying feelings of guilt and shame. (such as some sort of sexual immorality or sexual perversion) Therefore the practice of scapegoating is not only dishonest, it is also very cowardly. Unfortunately the scapegoater seldom acts alone. In the scapegoating process the scapegoat is often blamed by everyone around, as emotional and intense accusations by the scapegoater may have a strong suggestive effect on bystanders, without anyone being aware of how and why it all started."

THE PERSONALITY OF THE SCAPEGOATER

The scapegoat phenomenon will be described as enemy behaviour against an innocent and helpless victim, because the real source of frustration is not available or cannot be addressed for whatever reason. - Bob van der Meer Blaming the scapegoat for one's ills - or group ills - is almost the same thing that causes men to harm innocent children or mistreat animals. Frustration is acted out and projected onto somebody else, usually on someone without supporters or otherwise unable to protect herself or himself. Often scapegoaters, in their own minds, manage to convince themselves that what they are doing is somehow right. And bystanders, on the other hand, usually don't want to interfere, and thus scapegoat is alone. As personalities scapegoaters are usually dissatisfied with their own lives and themselves, and also with life in general. They may be self-righteous and hostile, sometimes even punitive and sadistic types, who get narcissistic gratification in controlling or even torturing the scapegoat. They raise themselves by lowering the other person. Often scapegoating can be seen as an example of projective identification. But in milder cases the scapegoater can be anyone temporarily dissatisfied and angry, but these occasional scapegoaters usually experience some shame and guilt afterwards, others don't. Most scapegoaters are not in touch with their own feelings, often they have no idea of how full of hate they really are, they are just dissatisfied and frustrated but also blissfully unaware of the original source of their frustration. Or at least they are unable to direct their anger to the original source. Often they manage, in their own minds, to turn things around and begin to believe that the scapegoat is somehow responsible for their frustration. A very suitable scapegoat candidate might be, for instance, someone who accidentally looks like whoever was the source of the original frustration (often a father or mother figure). Often the main scapegoater has a good social standing in the group and also some power. And as you can guess, the scapegoater does not want to lose that, no matter what. This means, that even if the scapegoater would gradually begin to see the innocence of the victim, the scapegoater might still throw more mud just to preserve her or his standing knowing that the mud will stick even to the innocent person. And assistant scapegoaters may do the same because they hate admitting that they have been duped, gullible and completely dishonest in blaming the scapegoat. They hate to admit they are wrong. To sum up, the main characteristics of a scapegoater are egotism, pride, self-righteousness, immaturity, dishonesty, weakness and cowardess.

SYMBOLIC CANNIBALISM ?

Evil dwells in the heart of the criminal without being felt there. It is felt in the heart of the man who is afflicted and innocent. - Simone Weil

Usually scapegoaters are people who have problems with their own instincts, they cannot satisfy them spontaneously, neither can they control them, instead they satisfy them vicariously through the scapegoat, sometimes trying to create a sado-masochistic relationship with the victim. There is usually also a lot of desire for power - scapegoaters seem to believe that if only the offending person, the scapegoat, could somehow be eliminated or mastered, all would be well. Some scapegoaters and persecutors have a background of once having been victims themselves, but not knowing it. If they were consciously aware of what has been once done to them, they might not have to project it onto others. As Alice Miller wrote: "Consciously experiencing one's own victimization instead of trying to ward it off provides a protection against sadism; i.e., the compulsion to torment and humiliate others." Many scapegoaters actively avoid looking at themselves, they are always on the lookout for someone to walk over, just to feel better themselves. In many ways scapegoating can be seen as a kind of symbolic cannibalism. Primitive man eats human flesh because of its symbolic characteristics, or he endows animals with human qualities. The modern scapegoater endows persons with subhuman qualities and eats his victim's soul in the process. He simply does not treat his victim as fully human. He lacks compassion, awareness, and psychological know-how. "Unintelligent people always look for a scapegoat", wrote Ernest Bevin. Scapegoaters may repress guilt feelings, but they can't avoid their subliminal effect. At least, not for ever. Thus scapegoaters may not totally avoid the consequences, which means that they suffer or will suffer too, although for a long time those subliminal guilt feelings in trying to surface into the consciousness may just aggravate scapegoaters to do some more scapegoating. And this again creates unconscious guilt feelings, and thus it goes on... He who brings sorrow with him stifles more happiness within himself than in the man he overwhelms. - Maeterlinck

Scapegoaters, Take Note

You see in others, what you know you have in yourself.

The Scapegoating Continues

Last month we learned about Florida State Representative Bob Allen, who got arrested for offering a policeman $20 in exchange for the cop allowing Allen to do him a perverted sexual 'favor' shall we say. Well the story is so much better now. Representative Allen says that he wasn't actually there to engage in some perverted sex. No, the truth of the matter is, he's just a racist. Seriously, that’s the story he’s going with, claiming that he was intimidated because there were a lot of black men around:

“This was a pretty stocky black guy, and there was nothing but other black guys around in the park,” Allen, who is white, told police in a taped statement after his arrest. Allen said he feared he “was about to be a statistic” and would have said anything just to get away.

(.... claiming he was intimidated because there were a lot of black men around. Hmm, black men huh? What a coincidence. Now where have I heard this kind of scapegoating to cover up bad behavior before? Er... Susan Smith springs to mind. It wasn't her who drove her two tiny sons into a river and left them there to drown, was it? Well of course not. How could it have been, she's 'white' and she's female! No, it was that big, bad, black dude that did it. Yes that's right, it was all his fault. I still remember those crocodile tears with every lie coming from her racist mouth. And she's only one case amongst many in the US!)

Meanwhile, a written statement from the undercover officer in question offers a slightly different version of the story. Officer Danny Kavanaugh says that he and two other cops were in the area, undercover, conducting a stakeout to try to catch a burglar. When they spotted Allen entering the park bathroom and behaving suspiciously, they came to the conclusion that he might be looking for sex, so Kavanaugh twice went into the restroom. The second time, he was in a stall drying his hands when he says that Allen popped his head up over the stall door:

After peering over the stall a second time, Allen pushed open the door and joined Kavanaugh inside, the officer wrote. Allen muttered ” ‘hi,’ ” and then said, ” ‘this is kind of a public place, isn’t it,’ ” the report said.

The officer said he asked Allen about going somewhere else and that the legislator suggested going “across the bridge, it’s quieter over there.”

“Well look, man, I’m trying to make some money; you think you can hook me up with 20 bucks?” Kavanaugh asked Allen.

The officer said Allen responded, “Sure, I can do that, but this place is too public.”

Then Kavanaugh said he told Allen, “I wanna know what I gotta do for 20 bucks before we leave.’ ” He said Allen replied: “I don’t know what you’re into.”

According to Kavanaugh’s statement, the officer said, “do you want just [oral sex]?” and Allen replied, “I was thinking you would want one.”

The officer said he then asked Allen, “but you’ll still give me the 20 bucks for that … and that the legislator said, “yeah, I wouldn’t argue with that.”

As Allen turned and motioned for the officer to follow him to his car, Kavanaugh identified himself as a police officer by raising his shirt and exposing his badge.

When Allen was being placed in a marked patrol car, he asked whether “it would help” if he was a state legislator, according to a police report. The officer replied, “No.”

When oh when will scapegoaters wake up and realize that as individuals, they are wholly responsible for what they do and stop childishly trying to blame others when something goes wrong in their lives or when their filthy perversions are exposed? They really need to realize that on their day of judgement, they will stand before a Holy God to give an account for their lives. On that day there will be no 'white privilege'. On that day, there will be no black people there to blame their sexual perversion on, they will stand before God - alone.

The Scapegoating Murderer

One of the most notorious scapegoaters was the racist bigot Susan Smith. She was the 'woman' who killed her two children by driving a car with them inside it into a river, leaving them to drown. Then, as if that wasn't bad enough, she then concocted a cock and bull story about a ficticious black man coming along and abducting the children, and presumably harming them. It wasn't her, of course not. It was that evil boogie man - the unidentified black man who racist whites always want to blame! Oh but of course, Susan Smith had her reasons for doing away with her children. Yes that's right. She had good cause to kill her children. You see, there was this wealthy man who she was having a relationship with who didn't want children. So she had to get rid of her children to keep him. You see, she had good cause. It's not her fault. It was the man's fault for not wanting children! (Oh, erm...... and of course that ficticious black man she blamed everything on) Born Susan Leigh Vaughan on September 26, 1971 in Union, South Carolina. Susan Smith had a troubled upbringing; her parents' relationship was often violent and soon after their divorce, her father committed suicide. Her mother quickly remarried a man who sexually abused Susan.
On October 25, 1994, Smith contacted the police saying she had been carjacked by an African-American man who fled with her two young sons in the car. After she made emotional pleas on television for the safe return of her children, the incident gained media attention and sympathy from around the world. However, nine days later, Smith admitted that she had pushed her car into nearby John D. Long Lake, drowning her sons, 3-year-old Michael and 14-month-old Alexander, who were strapped into their car seats inside.
Contempt for Smith was overwhelming, not only because of the racial tension ignited for the false accusation of a black man, but because her alleged motive was to get rid of her children in order to carry on a relationship with a wealthy man who wasn't interested in a woman with sons.
During her trial, Smith's stepfather, Republican Party and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell, testified that he had sexually molested Susan when she was a teenager and again in the months leading up to her drowning the boys. She was spared the death penalty and sentenced to life in prison. Susan Smith is serving her sentence at Leath Correctional Institution in South Carolina and will be eligible for parole in 2024, after serving a minimum of thirty years.